HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 12732 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Nobody is present on behalf of petitioner to press this petition even in the revised calling of the list whereas Sri Vivek Kumar Rai, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Bank as well as learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. 3. It is argued by Sri Vivek Kumar Rai, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent bank on the basis of instructions that the matter has already been settled between the parties hence the present petition has now become infructuous. 4. Since nobody is present on behalf of petitioner, the present petition is dismissed in default. September 18, 2025 Arti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar, Sujeet Gaurav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vivek Kumar Rai (Prakash Padia,J.) Anil Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARTI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad