IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 852 OF 2009 Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C aggrieved by the Judgment dated 19.3.2009 made in CC.No. 217 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tenali at Guntur District. Between: Ganipiseti Kishore Kumar, S/o. Nageswara Rao, Hindu, aged 28 years Occ:Cultivation, R/o. Atthota , Kollipara Mandal, Guntur District. ...Petitioner / Complainant AND 1. Ravuri Siva Krishna S/o. Sambasiva Rao, aged about 26 years, Hindu Two Wheeler Mechani, National Autogarrage, Opp; Andhra bank, R.L. Pet, Branch, Tenali, Guntur District. 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravathi ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. J U M V PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI. CH RAVINDRA BABU Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: APHC010641142009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE '■4? ... . 'V ■ PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 852/2009 Betvi/een: Ganiipiseti Kishore Kumar, ...PETITIONER AND Ravuri Siva Krishna And Another ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1J U MV PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2.CH RAVINDRA BABU The Court made the following: ORDER: The petitioner/cornplainant and the respondent No. 1/Accused are present. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the mediation was 2. successful and the parties have compromised. ' 2 4r- Dr. YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.852 of2009 Dated 06.05.2025 'S \ "t 3. Sri. Viswanadha S.S. Pavaki, the learned 1 mediator, has submitted mediator’s proceedings along with the signatures of the parties and also their respective counsels, paid Rs. 1,00,000/- It is submitted that the respondent No.1 has towards full and final settlement to the petitioner/complainant. Both the parties have matter. agreed to compromise the 4. The learned mediator submits that the matter has been compromised by the petitioner and the respondent No.1 in the mediation proceedings, and as such the criminal revision case may be disposed of as compromised. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner and the volunteered that an amount of Rs.5,000/- each mediator towards fees, and the same is recorded. respondent No.1 would be paid to the 6. The Criminal Revision Case has been filed challenging inadequacy of the sentence imposed by the learned Trial Court. the 7. In view of the report submitted by the learned trained mediator^ Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised. Accordingly, the judgment in C.C.No.217 of 2008 vide judgment dated 19.03.2009 is set aside and the accused/respondent No.1 is acquitted under Section 320 (8) oftheCr.P.C’. the 3 D/.yLR, J Crl.R.C.No.85'2 of 2009 Dated 06.05.2025 In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Tenali at Guntur District, (with records) 2. One CC to Sri. J. U. M. V. Prasad Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri Ch. Ravindra Babu, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. 6. Three CD Copies PR Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:06/05/2025 ORDER o ? 2 JUL 2025 m| . Current Seciion . CRLRC.No.852 of 2009 ar DISPOSING THE CRLRC AS COMPROMISED