[2025:RJ-JP:3939] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 538/2025 Ram Singh Shekhawat Son Of Shri Mohan Singh Shekhawat, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of S-203, Unnati Tower, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur (Raj). ----Accused Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, through P.P. ----Respondent 2. Dr. Rohit Sureka Son Of Shri Rajendra Kumar Sureka, First Address - 47, Sanjay Marg, Hathroi Scheme, Jaipur (Raj). Second Address - Manipal Hospital, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Sikar Road, Jaipur (Raj). ----Complainant-Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 28/01/2025 1. This criminal misc. petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to quash and set aside the FIR No.21/2025 registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur City (East) for the offences under Sections 308(2)and 189(2) of the BNS, 2023 alongwith all consequential investigation and proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the facts of which the present criminal case has been registered against the petitioner, the complainant earlier has lodged an FIR no.497/2024 on 10.10.2024 at Police Station Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur City (North) on the same facts. [2025:RJ-JP:3939] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-538/2025] 3. Learned counsel further submits that two FIRs cannot be registered in the same facts. 4. Learned counsel further submits that because of some money dispute, the accused-petitioner has been implicated in a case based on false and fabricated facts. 5. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the averments made in the present FIR so also the averments made in the earlier FIR No.497/2024. 6. The date of incident in both the criminal cases as referred by counsel for the petitioner altogether different and in such circumstances, it cannot be said that both the FIRs are based on the same facts. 7. As regards the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has been implicated in a case based on false and fabricated facts, this is for the Investigating Agency to search out whether the allegation made against the petitioner is false and fabricated or not. This Court finds no ground to interfere in the matter. 8. Accordingly, this criminal misc. petition stands dismissed. 9. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /44