- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5454 WP No. 102005 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA WRIT PETITION NO.102005 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SHASHI S/O MATTI BASAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC SELF EMPLOYEE, R/O NEAR SCHOO NADAVI VILLAGE, SIRUGUPPA TALUK, DIST BALLARI 583101. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SOUBHAGYA.S.VAKKUND, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY IS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M. S. BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BALLARI, DIST: BALLARI – 583101. 3. THE TAHASILDAR, BALLARI, DIST: BALLARI – 583101. 4. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, ROOPANAGUDI, DIST: BALLARI – 583101. Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5454 WP No. 102005 of 2025 5. THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT, TOLAMAMADI DIST: BALLARI – 583101. 6. YERRISWAMY S/O LINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT NIL, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST, R/O: TOLAMAMADI VILLAGE, BALLARI TALUK AND DISTRICT - 583101. 7. SHIVARAJKUMAR, S/O. V. RAMNJINI AGED ABOUT NIL OCCUPATION: R/O. DOOR NO.21, HAGARI RIVER, CANAL ROAD, CHAGANOOR GRAMA, BALLARI TALUK AND DISTRICT – 583101. 8. NAGENDRARAO S/O. SOMASHETTI, AGED ABOUT NIL, OCCUPATION: R/O. WARD NO.31, VIDYANAGAR 2ND CROSS, BALLARI TALUK AND DIST: 583101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI T. HANUMAREDDY, AGA FOR R1 TO R5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT, DIRECTION, ORDER OR ORDERS IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO SET ASIDE THE NOTICE DATED 06.02.2025 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEARING NO.SAM/KANDAYA/APPELU/39/2025 AS ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5454 WP No. 102005 of 2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that, against the impugned order passed by the Assistant Commissioner, revision lies with the Deputy Commissioner under section 136(3) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. There are no reasons to bypass the revision before the Deputy Commissioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Deputy Commissioner, in accordance with law. Sd/- (M.G.UMA) JUDGE EM CT:ANB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14