Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48226 (PNJ)

HARMINDER SINGH v. SUNITA RANI

CRM-A/1854/2019 · 2025-08-20

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

292 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-23604-2019 in/and CRM-A-1854-2019 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 20.08.2025 HARMINDER SINGH .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS SUNITA RANI .....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Anureet S. Sidhu, Advocate for the appellant(s). **** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) CRM-23604-2019 This application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 569 days in filing the appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the application and in view of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicant, the application is allowed and delay of 569 days in filing the appeal is condoned. CRM-A-2077-MA-2018 1. The present application has been preferred under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter ‘Cr.P.C.’) seeking grant of leave to appeal the judgment of acquittal dated 22.08.2017 passed by the learned Anuradha 2025.08.23 00:43 I agree to specified portions of this document CRM-23604-2019 in/and 2 CRM-A-1854-2019 (O&M) JMIC, Patiala in a case filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter ‘NI Act’). 2. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in M/s Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc., 2025(3) RCR (Criminal) 208, after considerable discussion and comparative interpretation of Sections 372 and 378(4) of Cr.P.C., concluded that the victim has a right to file an appeal under Section 372 of Cr.P.C. before the Court of Sessions. 3. Therefore, in view of the judgment rendered by the Apex Court in Celestium Financial (supra), the present application seeking leave to appeal is remanded back to the learned Sessions Judge, Patiala with a direction to treat the same as filed under Section 372 of the Cr.P.C. and entrust it to appropriate Court for its disposal. 4. The Registry is directed to send the complete paper-book and the record of the case to the learned Sessions Judge, Patiala forthwith. 5. Disposed of accordingly. 6. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 20.08.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Anuradha 2025.08.23 00:43 I agree to specified portions of this document