CRM-M-21274-2025 -1- 208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-21274-2025 Date of Decision10.07.2025 Suman …Petitioner vs. State of Haryana …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Parminder Walia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Ashwani Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Abhilaksh, Advocate and Mr. Rakesh Roy, Advocate for respondent No.2. *** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to her in case FIR No.0032 dated 14.01.2025 registered under Sections 20, 29, 61, 85 of NDPS Act, 1985, at Police Station Krishna Gate, District Kurukshetra. 2. While granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail by this Court on 29.04.2025, this Court had noticed the following contentions raised by learned counsel for the petitioner:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in the present case, Vicky @ Kallu was apprehended by the police on 14.01.2025, while he was carrying 1 kg 268 grams of Ganja, without any permit or licence. He further contends that the petitioner was neither named in the FIR nor there is any averment in the FIR, which even connects her with the commission of crime, in any HEMLATA 2025.07.10 22:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-21274-2025 -2- manner. The petitioner was named by the co-accused in his disclosure statement and except the said evidence, there was no material against the petitioner. The petitioner was never involved in any other criminal activity and is ready to join the investigation.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated the submissions and further submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and her custodial interrogation may not be required. 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Sudhir Kumar, also submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation. 5. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the interim order dated 29.04.2025 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S. 6. Pending application(s) stand(s) also disposed of. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 10.07.2025 JUDGE hemlata Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HEMLATA 2025.07.10 22:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document