Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48216 (RAJ)

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. SHAKUNTALA MEENA D/O SHRI RAMDYAL

SAW/1142/2025 · 2025-10-27

Baljinder Singh Sandhu, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:43056-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1142/2025 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj. Department Secretrariat, Jaipur. 2. Additional Examination Controller And Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Kota. ----Appellants Versus Shakuntala Meena D/o Shri Ramdyal D/o Shri Ramdayal, Aged About 29 Years, Village Keshopura, Tehsil Pipalda District, Kota. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Prateek Saxena with Ms. Divya Rathore & Ms. Anshu Ranga For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 27/10/2025 1. The appeal has been preferred by the State submitting that while the issue decided in the case of Bharti Upadhayay Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. (D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.1122/2017) vide order dated 10.08.2018 but after applying the ratio of the said judgment, the claim of the respondent is not made out. 2. We afraid that the issue was required to be addressed before the learned Single Judge where both the parties conceded of the issues having been decided in the case of Bharti Upadhayay (supra). [2025:RJ-JP:43056-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-1142/2025] 3. We, therefore, dismiss the appeal however, leaving it open to the appellant to file review, if they so choose. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACTING CJ Rahul/Diksha-85