APHC010386692025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19769/2025 Between: 1. NALLAPAREDDY PRASANNA KUMAR REDDY,, S/O.NALLAPUREDDY SRINIVASULU REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, EX-MLA, R/O. D.NO. 24- 1479 SUJATHAMMA COLONY, DARGAMITTA, NELLORE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ( HOME DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA GUNTUR HIGHWAY ROAD, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR. 3. THE ADITIONAL INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE. 5. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DARGAMITTA POLICE STATION, NELLORE. 7. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, DARGAMITTA POLICE STATION, NELLORE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the inaction of the Respondents No. 4 to 7, who failed to register the case as per law immediately on receiving report, dated 07.07.2025, further registering the case in Crime No. 125 / 2025 of IV Town Police Station Nellore, belatedly with false explanation for delayed registration by showing in the FIR Un Known Accused even though the report reveals the names of the some of the accused directly involved in the commission of offence and also the names of the persons at whose instance, in pursuance of the hatched conspiracy said offence was committed, further failed to consider the representation of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 and 3 to initiate enquiry against the Respondent No. 4 to 7, who failed to register the case immediately after the complaint received from the petitioner further registration of the Crime No. 125 / 2025 of IV Town Police Station Nellore by showing in the FIR Un Known Accused , even though the report reveals the names of the accused involved in the commission of offence and file a report before this Honble court and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the >Respondent No. 2 & 3 to conduct enquiry against the Respondent No. 4 to 7, who failed to register the case immediately after the complaint received from the petitioner further registration of the Crime No. 125 / 2025 of IV Town Police Station Nellore by showing in the FIR <Un Known Accused =, even though the report reveals the names of the accused involved in the commission of offence and file a report before this Hon?ble court, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pas Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V ROOPESH KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19769 OF 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: <….to declare the inaction of the Respondents No. 4 to 7, who failed to register the case as per law immediately on receiving report, dated 07.07.2025, further registering the case in Crime No. 125 / 2025 of IV Town Police Station Nellore, belatedly with false explanation for delayed registration by showing in the FIR Un Known Accused even though the report reveals the names of the some of the accused directly involved in the commission of offence and also the names of the persons at whose instance, in pursuance of the hatched conspiracy said offence was committed, further failed to consider the representation of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 and 3 to initiate enquiry against the Respondent No. 4 to 7, who failed to register the case immediately after the complaint received from the petitioner further registration of the Crime No. 125 / 2025 of IV Town Police Station Nellore by showing in the FIR Un Known Accused , even though the report reveals the names of the accused involved in the commission of offence and file a report before this Honble court and pass…= 2. Heard Sri V.Roopesh Kumar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that despite specifically mentioning the names of the accused in the complaint, the police have not registered the crime against them. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submits that during the course of investigation, based on the video clippings, the police have identified the persons who are involved in the crime. 5. Considering the submissions made, since the investigation is still pending, it is apposite to dispose of the present writ petition. However, the Investigating Officer is directed to look into the grievance of the petitioner and take an appropriate decision in accordance with law, and conclude the investigation as expeditiously as possible. It is left open to the petitioner to raise all permissible contentions at the time after the filing of the final report before the Court. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 11.12.2025 KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19769 of 2025 Dated.11.12.2025 KKV 28 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P.No.19769 of 2025 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 11.12.2025 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP,J KKV