Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48215 (RAJ)

RAHUL S/O SHIVPRAKASH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14485/2025 · 2025-11-10

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44874] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14485/2025 Rahul S/o Shivprakash, R/o Ward No. 08, Malipura, Sewar, Police Station Sewar, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan (At Present Confined In Sub-Jail Bandikui, District Dausa, Rajasthan) ----Applicant Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Sukhdev Singh Solanki For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 10/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.376/2019 registered at Police Station Bandikui, District Dausa for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that co- accused has been enlarged on bail and the case of the applicant is at better footing from that of co-accused. It is also submitted that the trial will take a long time. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. It is submitted that the applicant is having criminal antecedents. 4. Heard, considered and perused the file. [2025:RJ-JP:44874] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14485/2025] 5. Considering the fact that there are strong criminal antecedents against the applicant; the fact that there is fraud effected in a calculated manner; that the applicant is absconding for a long period of time, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail at this stage. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /202