[2025:RJ-JP:49271] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 15967/2025 Sher Singh @ Shera Gurjar S/o Rameshwar Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Chamadpura, P.S. Maasalpura, District Karauli. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rinesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 04/12/2025 1. This second bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.1277/2024 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South) for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 119(1), 109(1), 126(2), 131, 333, 331(6), 324(5), 324(6), 326(g), 351(2), 111(2)(a), 79 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. After completion of investigation, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 119(1), 109(1), 126(2), 131, 333, 331(6), 324(5), 324(6), 326(g), 351(2), 111(2) (b) & 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. The first bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn by this court vide order dated 24.09.2025 [2025:RJ-JP:49271] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-15967/2025] while giving liberty to renew the prayer for bail after submission of result of investigation. Now, charge-sheet has been filed in this matter thus, this second bail application has been preferred. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that none of the injuries sustained to the injured has been opined as dangerous to life. Counsel submits that other co-accused namely Lavish Sayal @ Lavish Boxer and Nagendra Beniwal have already been granted benefit of bail by this Court and learned trial Court respectively. Counsel submits that there are two criminal antecedents of the petitioner wherein he is on bail. It is contended that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since 19.08.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially considering the material available on record in the form of charge-sheet, as also the fact that co-accused Lavish Sayal @ Lavish Boxer and Nagendra Beniwal have already been granted benefit of bail and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow the second bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:49271] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-15967/2025] 7. This second bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Sher Singh @ Shera Gurjar S/o Rameshwar Singh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. Considering the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of bail granted by this Court. The petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the concerned police station in first week of every month, till trial is concluded. 9. Concerned SHO shall enter the attendance of the petitioner in the Roznamcha. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 10. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to the petitioner by this Court. 11. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. [2025:RJ-JP:49271] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-15967/2025] 12. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /15