Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48212 (KAR)

HINDULIDA SAMAJADA ABHIVRUDDI VIDYAVARDAK SANGA (R) GIRIYAL v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/103261/2025 · 2025-05-22

Ravi V Hosmani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:7219 WP No.103261 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF MAY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI WRIT PETITION NO.103261 OF 2025 (GM-KSR) BETWEEN: HINDULIDA SAMAJADA ABHIVRUDDI VIDYAVARDAK SANGA (R), GIRIYAL, AT. GIRIYAL, POST. KATNUR, TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN-580024. …PETITIONER (BY SRI HEMANTHKUMAR L. HAVARAGI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DHARWAD DISTRICT, DHARWAD, D.C. COMPOUND, DHARWAD. 3. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE AND REGISTRAR OF SOCIETY DHARWAD, DIST. DHARWAD-580001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V.S. KALASURMATH, AGA FOR RESPONDENTS) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DATED 29.04.2025 BEARING NO.DRZ/SAM.SAM/CR-/2025-26, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3, VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO RE-CONSIDER THE PROPOSAL OF MANAGING COMMITTEE OF THE PETITIONER IN THE YEAR 2025-26 DATED 25.04.2025 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER, VIDE ANNEXURE-B. CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.05.23 10:26:27 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:7219 WP No.103261 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI) Writ petition is filed challenging endorsement dated 29.04.2025 at Annexure-D issued by respondent no.3 intimating petitioner that his application for approval of managing committee was rejected on certain technicalities. 2. Learned AGA accepting notice for respondents no.1 to 3 would submit that application for approval of management committee was submitted on basis of Annual General Meeting stated to have been conducted on 25.04.2025. It is also informed that the list of previous management committee and details of renewal of society were not appended. 3. Leaned counsel Sri Hemanthkumar L. Havaragi for petitioner would submit that application was filed with said particulars. He would however submit that petitioner would file one more set of application with appendices as sought for and submitted for directing respondents’ for early consideration of same. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:7219 WP No.103261 of 2025 4. In view of above submission, it would not be necessary to keep this writ petition pending to decide on legality of Annexure-D, writ petition is disposed of permitting petitioner to file one more application under acknowledgement to respondent no.3. If application is filed within 15 days from today, respondents to consider same and pass appropriate orders within two weeks thereafter and intimate result to petitioner. 5. It is clarified that endorsement dated 29.04.2025 would not come in the way of petitioner verifying application and its consideration. Sd/- (RAVI V.HOSMANI) JUDGE CKK, CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 8