STUDIO URBANITY TH VARUN AND ANOTHER v. JAMMU MUNICIPAL CORPORATION TH ITS COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2572/2025 · 2025-09-17
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4821 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4821 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- WP(C) No. 2572/2025
Studio Urbanity and Anr. .....Petitioner (s)
Through: Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate
Vs
Jammu Municipal Corporation and Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Harshwardan Gupta, Adv.
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 17.09.2025
01. While the matter was being argued, it has been brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel for the respondents that the concerned Commissioner has issued fresh order dated 17.09.2025 by virtue of which the premises of the petitioners has been de-sealed with immediate effect, which is taken on record.
02. The petitioners, however, through the medium of the instant petition has called in question, the order of sealing dated 09.09.2025. Mr. Sachin Gupta,
learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the grievance stands redressed in view of order dated 17.09.2025, the petitioners do not want to pursue the instant petition anymore.
03. Thus, in light of the latest order passed by the concerned Commissioner dated 17.09.2025(supra), the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn as the grievance stands redressed.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
17.09.2025
Riya Kochhar
S. No. 117