SHRINITHI CAPITAL FINANCE CO Represented by its Partner P Dayanithi v. D SATHISHKUMAR
Arb Appln/580/2025 · 2025-07-08
Abdul Quddhose
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48209 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48209 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Arb.Appln.No.580 of 2025 M/s.Shrinithi Capital Finance Co and Another ... Applicant Vs. D. Sathishkumar and Other ... Respondents ABDUL QUDDHOSE.J., The notices sent to the respondents have been duly served. The affidavit of service has also been filed by the learned counsel for the applicant enclosing the delivery report. Despite service of notice, no one has entered appearance on behalf of the respondents. Hence, the respondents are set exparte by this Court. The vehicle has already been repossessed and the custody of the same has been handed over to the applicant.
2. Since the vehicle has already been repossessed and the custody of the same has been handed over to the applicant and since the respondents have been set exparte by this Court, this application is closed. 08.07.2025 ab 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
ABDUL QUDDHOSE.J., ab Arb.Appln.No.580 of 2025 08.07.2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis