[2025:RJ-JP:46584] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17699/2025 Hariram S/o Hanuman Prasad, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Vill - Hirwa, Teh - Buhana, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary (Department Of Home), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The Director General Of Police, (Headquarter) Lalkhothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Inspector Of Police, Jaipur Range, Jaipur. 4. The Superintendent Of Police, Jhunjhunu District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Parth Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 19/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayers: “It is, therefore humbly prayed that Your Lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and by an appropriate writ, order or direction: - 1. Order dated 12.03.2025 passed by the respondents, by which respondents kept the result of petitioner, in sealed envelope, for promotion on the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector, against vacancy year 2019-2020, due to A.C.B. matter, may kindly be quashed and set aside, in the interest of justice. 2. Order dated 22.05.2025 passed by [2025:RJ-JP:46584] (2 of 3) [CW-17699/2025] the respondents, by which respondents did not disclose the result of petitioner after promotion cadre course (P.C.C) for promotion on the post of Assistant Sub- Inspector, against vacancy year 2019- 2020, may kindly be quashed and set aside, in the interest of justice. 3. The respondents may Kindly further be directed to reveal the fate of the petitioner, kept in the sealed cover for promotion to the post of Assistant Sub- Inspector against the vacancies of 2019-2020, in the interest of justice. 4. The respondents may Kindly further be directed to promote the petitioner on the post of Assistant Sub-Inspector against the vacancies of 2019-20, in Jaipur range, Jaipur, with all consequential benefits, in the interest of justice. 5. Any other appropriate order, which may be found just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, be passed in favour of the petitioner. 6. Cost of the writ petition may also be awarded in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Mr. Parth Sharma on behalf of Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG accepts notice for respondent(s). 3. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG as counsel for respondent(s). 4. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring order dated 28.03.2025, State of Rajasthan Vs. Dr. Anil Kumar Paliwal (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3501/2025) and DOP circular dated 04.06.2008 submits that the case of present petitioner is squarely covered by the ratio as laid down by this Hon’ble Court in light of circular of DOP and the writ petition be disposed of in accordance with ratio in case of State of Rajasthan Vs. Dr. Anil Kumar Paliwal (supra). [2025:RJ-JP:46584] (3 of 3) [CW-17699/2025] 5. Learned counsel for respondent(s) submits that if this ratio is applicable, the respondents will consider the applicability of the ratio. 6. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner, a liberty is granted to petitioner to file a representation to the respondent(s) within a period of four weeks from now in light of ratio as referred by learned counsel for petitioner and also the circular dated 04.06.2008 issued by the DOP. The respondent(s) are directed to examine case of petitioner and if the ratio is applicable, extend the benefit as permitted and in case of deviation pass an appropriate but reasoned and speaking order within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /89