RANJEET SINGH KHANGAROT @ RAJU SON OF LATE SHRI SHIV SINGH KHANGAROT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/8210/2025 · 2025-10-06
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48200 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48200 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:40398] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8210/2025 Ranjeet Singh Khangarot @ Raju Son Of Late Shri Shiv Singh Khangarot, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 16, Sundar Nagar Khatipura, Jaipur Police Station Vaishali Nagar , Jaipur At Present R/o Plot No. 308, Balaji Dham, Nagar Shiv Mandir, Kanakpura, Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur West. ( At Present In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. R. D. S. Naruka For State(s) For Complainant : : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Arvind Sharma HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 06/10/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused- applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 88/2025 registered at Police Station Chitrakoot District Jaipur West for the offence(s) under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 61(2) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant has no criminal antecedents registered against him and is in custody ever-since 01.05.2025. The lis in question pertains to monetary dispute and is having a civil flavour. Moreover, the matter is triable by Magistrate. Learned counsel further submits that charge-sheet has already been filed and
[2025:RJ-JP:40398] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8210/2025] trial would take time to conclude and no useful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-applicant behind bars till disposal of the case.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor along with learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application and have submitted that accused-applicant is a habitual offender.
4. Heard.
5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and taking note of the fact that the matter is triable by Magistrate; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant; that present matter pertains to a monetary dispute and is having a civil flavour; that accused- applicant is in custody since 01.05.2025; that charge-sheet has been filed in the instant matter, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Ranjeet Singh Khangarot @ Raju Son Of Late Shri Shiv Singh Khangarot shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /51