Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4820 (DEL)

MASTER ADWAIT HARITAS THROUGH HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MR VIVEK SHARMA v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE & ORS.

W.P.(C)/6603/2025 · 2026-05-18

Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6603/2025 MASTER ADWAIT HARITAS THROUGH HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MR VIVEK SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Piyush Sanghi, Mr. Nikhil Singh, Ms.Khushbu Sahu, Ms. Sharmishta Solanki, Mr.Raahithya Raj Mishra, Mr.Aditya Singh Raghuvanshi, Mr.Jayant Yadav, Ms. Sana Rais, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ripudamn Bhardwaj, CGSC, Mr.Kushagra Kansal, Mr. Amit Kumar Rana, Advocates for R-UOI. Mr Darpan Wadhwa, Senior Advocate with Mr Shrawan Chopra, Ms Prachi Agarwal, Mr Achyut Tewari, Ms Krisha Baweja, Rea Bhalla Advocates for R-2. Mr. Tanveer Oberoi, Advocate for R- 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 18.05.2026 1. Respondent No. 2, namely Roche Products (India) Pvt. Ltd., has filed its counter affidavit. After making brief submissions in paragraph 6 onwards This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2026 at 16:47:22 of the said affidavit, the following stand has been taken in paragraphs 10 to 12 thereof:– “10. In line with the above, for the Petitioner to obtain the free vials in lieu of the purchases of vials made through AIIMS, the Petitioner would need to follow the following steps: a. Provide a valid neurologist's prescription detailing the patient's weight, required dosage, and other relevant medical information. b. Submit proof of purchase, such as paid invoices for out-of-pocket expenses or a purchase order for those under a reimbursement scheme. i.e., such as through AIIMS. c. Complete the online verification process by sharing a government- issued ID. d. Successful completion of these steps ensures enrolment into the TBT patient support program. 11.It is clarified here that since the Petitioner has an existing TBT enrolment number, therefore in his case, Roche will need a prescription, alongside the doctor and patient consent forms, which must be signed by the treating physician at AIIMS, ie, if the Petitioner has procured the drug from AIIMS through government reimbursement system to further provide the drug to him. The Petitioner and / or AIIMS may directly approach Roche for the above purpose, and Roche will endeavour to expeditiously process his application, given all eligibility criteria set out as per TBT processes are met. 12. Roche also offers a patient enrolled with TBT, the following Post- Enrolment Procedures and Benefits: a. TBT will supply the remaining Evrysdi PAP vials directly to the patient based on medical necessity. The number of PAP vials will be based on their paid purchases and as per the applicable PAP. b. Vials are delivered in a staggered manner to ensure product quality and eliminate the need for patient storage, considering risdiplam requiring specific handling and storage conditions. c. Deliveries occur one to two days before the scheduled therapy; patients should contact TBT to order the next vial according to their medical needs d. A trained phlebotomist will visit the patient's home to reconstitute the vial, ensuring the dosage is prepared correctly before handing it over. e. Enrolled patients can access value-added services, including dietary counseling and physiotherapy, at no extra cost.” This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2026 at 16:47:22 2. The aforesaid suggestion appears to be reasonable and is acceptable to the petitioner. 3. The petitioner is permitted to avail of the aforesaid suggestion and the remedy extended by Respondent No. 2. 4. In view of the above observations, the present petition stands disposed of. 5. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MAY 18, 2026/Nc This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2026 at 16:47:22