APHC010038422025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 1982 of 2025 Between: Kata Sambaiah ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent No 3 in pressurizing the Petitioner to settle the civil dispute with the 4th Respondent without there being any written complaint or FIR against the petitioner and interfering with the personal life and liberty of the Petitioner 2 and his family members without any legal cause as illegal arbitrary and violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official Respondents and their subordinates to forbear from interfering with personal life and liberty of the petitioner and his family members by pressurizing the Petitioner to settle the civil disputes with the 4th Respondent without any legal cause and pass such...” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondents are interfering with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent No.4. 4. Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the State on instructions would submit that respondent/Police will not interfere with the civil dispute between the parties. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the considered opinion that the Writ Petition can be disposed of at the stage of admission itself, without going into merits by directing the respondent No.3 to follow due procedure established under law, if they intend to call the petitioner to the Police Station, in connection with any crime or enquiry. 3 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. _______________________ ___ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 28.01.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 1982 of 2025 Date: 28.01.2025 PSA