APHC010635412025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 33039/2025 Between: GARIKAPATI PUJITHA, D/O GARIKAPATI VENKATA SIVA RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O 13-168, TULASI NAGAR, WATER TANK ROAD, 4TH LINE KANURU, VIJAYAWADA NTR DISTRICT AP -520007 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT A.P. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF PLICE, GOVERNORPETA, VIJAYAWADA 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER SHO, PENAMALUR POLICE STATION NTR DISTRICT A.P. 4. BATTULA REVATHI, W/O BATTULA SREENU AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O GOPALAPURAM VILLAGE, A.KONDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT AP 5. BATTULA SREENU, S/O BATTULA SUBBA RAO AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O GOPALAPURAM VILLAGE, A.KONDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT AP ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NARVNENI CHANDRASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the respondent No.3 not registering the FIR against respondent Nos 4 and 5 is illegal, 2 arbitrary and opposed to Article 14, 21 19 of Constitution of India and opposed to principles of natural justice and consequently direct respondent No. 3 to register an FIR against them as per due process of law.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, on receipt of complaint of the Petitioner, Police conducted preliminary and having found the contents of the complaint do not disclose any cognizable offence and that the matter is of civil nature, have not registered any case against Respondent Nos.4 and 5. 3. Sri N.Chandra Sekhar, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out her remedies before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:03.12.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.33039 of 2025 Dt.03.12.2025 Dinesh