Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4819 (KAR)

SMT B H YALIGAR W/O PI. THIMMENALLI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/102059/2025 · 2025-04-24

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6810 WP No. 102059 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 102059 OF 2025 (S-DIS) BETWEEN: SMT. B.H.YALIGAR W/O PI. THIMMENALLI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, WORKING AS WOMEN HOME GUARD, METAL NO.125, IN THE OFFICE OF DISTRICT COMMANDANT, HOME GUARD, HAVERI DISTRICT-581 110. R/AT. PATNI BUILDING, VIDYANAGAR, 1ST CROSS, WEST COLONY. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GIRISH BANDI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY SECRETARY TO THE HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA-560 001. 2. THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, TO DIRECTOR GENERAL OFFICER POLICE, COMMANDANT GENERAL HOME GUARDS AND DIRECTOR CIVIL DEFENCE BENGALURU, CENTRAL OFFICE, ANNASWAMY, MODHALIYAR ROAD, NO.1, BENGALURU-560 042. 3. THE DISTRICT HOME GUARD, COMMANDANT OFFICE, HAVERI, VIDHYANAGAR, HAVERI DISTRICT-581 110. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA.R.PATIL., HCGP) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6810 WP No. 102059 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Girish Bandi., counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Kirtilata.R.Patil., HCGP for the respondents have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed Seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order dated:28.02.2025 passed by the third respondent vide Annexure-D and issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents, to continue the petitioner in the present place as Women Home Guard metal No.125 before the third respondent i.e., at District Home Commandant Office at Haveri District. 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. The dismissal notice was issued to the petitioner on 28.02.2025 with effect from 28.03.2025. The petitioner suitably replied to the same on 10.03.2025. This Court vide order - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6810 WP No. 102059 of 2025 dated:08.04.2025 had directed the respective parties to appraise the Court about the present status of the petitioner as of today. Pursuant to the same, HCGP has filed a memo stating that the petitioner is not yet removed from the Home Guard Organization. She would further submit that a true copy of the communication received from the Office of the Commandant Home Guards, Haveri District is furnished along with the memo. HCGP, therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and an appropriate order may be passed. The oral submission and the memo is placed on record. The petitioner has already given a reply to the notice, hence, the third respondent is directed to consider the reply and proceed further with the matter, in accordance with the law. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP,RH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 64