Smt. Thammana Siva Parvati, v. The Union of India,
WP/2338/2020 · 2025-01-22
Kiranmayee Mandava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4819 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4819 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010038772020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Smt. Thammana Siva Parvati, The Union Of India and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAMIDI SATHYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. S S VARMA
2. . The Court made the following:
ORDER:
On 07.11.2024, it is stated that the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ramidi Sathyanarayana is no more and therefore, this Court directed the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner. Accordingly, the notice was unserved on the petitioner. Howe hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner on 02.12.2024 and IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 2338/2020 Smt. Thammana Siva Parvati, ...PETITIONER AND The Union Of India and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
RAMIDI SATHYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): The Court made the following: On 07.11.2024, it is stated that the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ramidi Sathyanarayana is no more and therefore, this Court directed the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner. Accordingly, the notice was unserved on the petitioner. However, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner on 02.12.2024 and IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3458] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) On 07.11.2024, it is stated that the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ramidi Sathyanarayana is no more and therefore, this Court directed the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner. Accordingly, the notice was ver, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner on 02.12.2024 and
2
20.01.2025, therefore the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal.
2. Today, though the matter is listed “For Dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner.
3. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
Date: 22.01.2025 MSI
3
205
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 2338/2020
Date: 22.01.2025 MSI