Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48187 (KAR)

RUDRAPPA S/O MALLAPPA TIRAKAPPANNAVAR v. SMT.MALLAVVA @ W/O SIDDAPPA PATIL

RSA/100373/2019 · 2025-03-24

E S Indiresh

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5346 RSA No. 100373 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 100373 OF 2019 (PAR-) BETWEEN: RUDRAPPA S/O. MALLAPPA TIRAKAPPANNAVAR, AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. RUDRAPUR-591119, TQ: SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELAGAVI. …APPELLANT (RUDRAPPA APPELLANT COURT NOTICE, SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) AND: SMT. MALLAVVA @ MALLAVVA W/O. SIDDAPPA PATIL, AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. AT POST: PHULAGADDI-591224, TQ: GOKAK, DIST: BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. G.I. GACHCHINAMATH, ADVOCATE) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC., PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS SECOND APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN DATED 05/03/2019 IN R.A.NO.2/2018 PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE SAUNDATTI AT: SAUNDATTI BY ALLOWING THE APPEAL OF CROSS OBJECTOR/APPELLANT BEFORE FIRST APPELLANT COURT AND BY SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03/04/2017 IN O.S. NO.83/2016 ON THE FILE OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. AT: SAUNDATTI, AND THIS HON’BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO HOLD THAT THE RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF IS NOT ENTITLE TO 1/4TH SHARE AS SHE IS BORN IN THE YEAR 1955 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5346 RSA No. 100373 of 2019 ORAL JUDGMENT Notice issued by this court is served on the appellant. Report of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Belagavi with regard to service of notice on the appellant is accepted. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant or his counsel. Accordingly, the Regular Second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9