APHC010258082020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 17011/2020 Between: 1. MARADA BHASKARA RAO, FATHER NAME. M.KRISHNA MURTHY, AGE. 52, ANANTHAGIRI GRAMPANCHAYAT, VAJRAPU KOTHUR MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - PANCHYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI - 522503, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. MANDAL PARISHATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER MPDO, VAJRAPU KOTHUR MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. EXTENSION OFFICER PR AND RD, TEKKALI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM ISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the proceedings Rc.No.1051/2017/P5, dated 28.9.2018 and the consequential notice No.1420, dated 21.3.2020 issued by the 2nd and 3rd respondents as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and set aside the proceedings Rc.No.1051/2017/P5, dated 28.9.2018 and the consequential notice No.1420, dated 21.3.2020 issued by the 2nd and 3rd respondents and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim suspension of all further proceedings pursuant to the proceedings Rc.No.1051/2017/P5, dated 28.9.2018 and consequential notice No.1420, dated 21.3.2020 issued by the 2nd & 3rd respondents, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V SESHA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 3. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri A. Lalith, learned counsel representing Smt. V. Sesha Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that she has given 8No Objection Vakalat9 to the petitioner. 2. On earlier occasions i.e., on 29.10.2025 and 25.11.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Having received 8No Objection Vakalat9, the petitioner did not choose to put up his appearance, which shows that the cause in the writ petition does not survives and that the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. If at all the petitioner still feels that the cause in the writ petition survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two months. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 10.12.2025 ANS 4 277 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 17011/2020 Date: 10.12.2025 ANS