APHC010547362024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 28587 OF 2024 Between: 1. CHILAKA SOLOMON RAJU, S/o Moses, Aged about 53 years, Occ. Correspondent, ABM High School, Markapur Town, Prakasam District. 2. Uppalapati .Monohar, s/o Jakraiah, Aged about 53 years, Occ. School Assistant, ABM High School, Markapur Town, Prakasam District 3. Kandula VijayaKalavathi, w/o. Praveen Ratna Kumar- Aged about 46 years, Occ. School Assistant, ABM High School, Markapur Town, Prakasam District 4. Kandula Anil Kumar, S/o KandulaPeddaYesu, Aged about 38 years Occ. Secondary Grade -II -Telugu Pandit, ABM High School Markapur Town, Prakasam District 5. Y.sheela Devi, D/o.Venkataiah, Aged about 42 years, Occ. Secondary Grade Teacher, ABM High School, Markapur Town, Prakasam District 6. Y.Byula Rani, D/o. Venkataiah, Aged about 40 years, Occ. Secondary Grade Teacher, ABM High School, Markapur Town, Prakasam District ...Petitioners AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government Education Department Secretariat VelagapudiAmaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner and Director of School Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat Velagapudi Amaravati,Guntur District. SRK, J WP No.28587 of 2024 2 3. The Regional Joint Director of School Education, Nagarampalem Guntur, Guntur District. 4. The District Education Officer, Prakasam District, at Ongole. 5. The Deputy Education Officer, Markapur Prakasam District 6. The Mandal Education Officer, Markapur Town and Mandal Prakasam District. 7. The Special Officer, ABM High School Markapur Town and Mandal Prakasam District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order particularly nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondents did not considering the representation dated 12.09.2024 submitted by the petitioner/s request on behalf his staff 8 members from unaided to aided staff and requesting you to give permission for appointment filing up based on the R.C.No.ESE02-17/132/2024-CSE Dated 19.08.2024. Which is illegal, arbitrary and ultra virus Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300 A of the Constitution of India. Counsel for the Petitioners: SAIDULU S K Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR EDUCATION SRK, J WP No.28587 of 2024 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition and he addressed a letter dated 04.11.2025 to the Registry to that effect. 2. Permission is granted. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:19.11.2025 Nsr SRK, J WP No.28587 of 2024 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.28587 of 2024 Date:19.11.2025 Nsr