SHAHRUKH KHAN S/O SHRI DHEESU KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/13332/2025 · 2025-10-17
Anand Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48185 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48185 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:42706] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.13332/2025 Shahrukh Khan S/o Shri Dheesu Khan, aged about 30 Years, R/o House No.09, Sindhiyo Ki Masjid, Gosiwada Mohalla, Mandiya Road, Police Station Kotwali, Pali District Pali Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined in Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.13333/2025 Aryan Meena S/o Shri Chhitarmal Meena, aged about 19 years, R/o Meeno Ki Dhani, Sandarsar Road, Village Kaladera, Police Station Kaladera, Jaiupr, at present Tenant Plot No.18 House of Shri Punit Lal, Ved Vila Colony, Near SGRP College, Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present in Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sunita Saini with Mr. Ashok Veer Singh Mr. Ravindra Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 17/10/2025
1. These bail applications under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 have been filed by the accused- petitioners in respect of F.I.R. No.377/2025 registered at Police
[2025:RJ-JP:42706] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13332/2025] Station-Vaishali Nagar, District-Jaipur(West) for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2), 318(4) & 61(2) of B.N.S.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on account of opening and providing mule accounts in the bank, petitioners have falsely been implicated in the instant matter, whereas even as per FIR, there are no direct allegations of active involvement of the petitioners and it has been alleged that they have been given Rs.5,000/- as commission.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the offences alleged against the petitioners are triable by Magistrate and there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners. Hence, a prayer has been made to grant the bail to the petitioners.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications.
5. Considered the submissions made at Bar.
6. In the light of above facts that the offences against the petitioners are triable by Magistrate, there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners as well as allegation with regard to take commission reflected in the FIR would not suggest any active involvement of the petitioners, without making any comment over the merits of the case, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.
7. Accordingly, these Bail Applications are hereby allowed. The accused-petitioners Shahrukh Khan S/o Shri Dheesu Khan & Aryan Meena S/o Shri Chhitarmal Meena shall be released on bail in pursuance of F.I.R. No.377/2025 registered at Police Station-Vaishali Nagar, District-Jaipur(West) on furnishing a
[2025:RJ-JP:42706] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13332/2025] personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- each along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each. That apart, the accused-petitioners shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) They shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) They shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) They shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless their presence is exempted by the trial Court. (iv) They shall regularly mark their attendance in the concerned Police Station on 25th day of every month. Concerned S.H.O shall maintain the register of attendance of the accused- petitioners. (v) On repetition of similar nature of offence during trial, the instant bail shall stand automatically cancelled.
8. In case of failure of observance of the conditions, a ground for cancellation of bail would arise.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/585-586