Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48181 (PAT)

Mantu Rajbhar @ Mintu @ Raj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./38710/2025 · 2025-06-25

Sandeep Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38710 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Buxar ====================================================== 1. Mantu Rajbhar @ Mintu @ Raj Kumar S/O Late Tulsi Rajbhar R/O Mohalla- Samhar (Station Road), P.S.- Dumraon, Distt.- Buxar 2. Tulsi Raj @ Tulsi Rajbhar S/O Late Kishun Rai R/O Mohalla- Samhar (Station Road), P.S.- Dumraon, Distt.- Buxar 3. Golu @ Rahul Kumar @ Golu D.J Wala @ Golu Rajbhar D.J Wala S/O Jainath Singh R/O Mohalla- Samhar (Station Road), P.S.- Dumraon, Distt.- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Vasantu @ Santlal S/O Late Prasidadhan @ Late Prasidhan R/O Vill.- Jamgaon, P.O.- Kaithi, Dist.- Sonbhadra, U.P.- 231215 ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Surendra Prasad Singh Mr. Shyam Kr. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 25-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with POCSO Case No. 127 of 2024 (Buxar Mahila P.S. Case No. 62 of 2024) registered for the offence under Sections 70(1), 331(4) of the BNS, 2023 and under Section 4/6 of the POCSO Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are accused of having participated in the gang rape of the victim/s who was working in Orkeshtra. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38710 of 2025(2) dt.25-06-2025 2/2 4. The victim/s has supported the prosecution case in the statement given under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. but subsequently during trial they have resiled from their statement and it appears that the petitioners and other accused persons are tampering with the evidence. 5. The petitioner no. 1 is in custody since 31.08.2024, petitioner no. 02 is in custody since 30.08.2024 and the petitioner no. 3 is in custody since 3.9.2024. 6. Considering the serious allegations levelled against the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U