2025:JHHC:20008 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI S. A. No. 258 of 2017 1. Muneshwar Chamar 2. Rajdeo Chamar All sons of Dashrath Chamar 3. Bhagirathi Chamar, Son of Late Gudan Chamar All resident of Village- Dhanda, Tola-Khadiya, P.O. & P.S. & District-Garhwa. … … Plaintiffs/Appellants/Appellants Versus 1. Ramdeo Chamar, Son of Dashrath Chamar 2. Kismatiya Devi, wife of Ramdeo Chamar 3. Mostt. Rajmatiya Devi, wife of Late Chattu Chamar 4. Kail Chamar, Son of Late Chattu Chamar, Sl. No. 1 to 4 all resident of Village- Dhanda, Tola-Khadiya, P.O. & P.S. & District- Garhwa. 5. Nathu Chamar 6. Lalan Chamar 7. Jhulan Chamar 8. Dadan Chamar Sl. No. 5 to 8 all sons of Late Mathura Chamar. 9. Bigan Ram, Son of Late Sahdeo Chamar 10. Ishra Ram, son of Belas Ram 11. Shyam Bihari Choudhary 12. Lalan Choudhary 13. Banshi Choudhary Sl. No. 11 to 13 all sons of Late Parmeshwar Choudhary 14. Shiv Narayan Choudhary 15. Shivnath Choudhary Sl. No. 14 & 15 both sons of Late Muesh Choudhary 16. Sheo Choudhary, son of Late Devi Choudhary. Sl. No. 5 to 16 all resident of Tola-Garhauta of Village- Danda, P.O. & P.S. & District- Garhwa (Jharkhand) ... ... Defendants/Respondents/Respondents 17. Jineshwar Chamar, son of Dashrath Chamar, Resident of Village- Dhanda, Tola-Khadiya, P.O. & P.S. & District- Garhwa. … … Plaintiffs/Appellants/Performa Respondent --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- 11/22.07.2025 1. This second appeal has been filed against the Judgment dated 21.02.2017 (decree signed on 02.03.2017) passed by learned District 2025:JHHC:20008 2 Judge-III, Garhwa in Partition Appeal No. 08 of 2012 whereby the judgment dated 06.03.2012 (decree signed on 22.03.2012) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division)-II (Munsiff), Garhwa in Partition Suit No. 46 of 1997 has been upheld. The Partition Suit No. 46 of 1997 has been dismissed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division)-II (Munsiff), Garhwa. 2. Learned counsel Ms. Alisha Lakra under instructions of Mr. Ayush Aditya, Advocate on record has submitted that their client has taken the file and she has no instructions to argue this case. 3. Considering the aforesaid submissions, this second appeal is dismissed as not pressed. 4. Pending I.A., if any, is closed. 5. Let this order be communicated to the concerned courts through “FAX/e-mail”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Rakesh/-