- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5336 WP No. 101983 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 101983 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. ABUSEEM ENTERPRISES, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM R/BY ITS SHRI. MOHAMMAD YUSUF SIRKAZI, AGE: YEARS, OCC: MANAGER, R/O: LIG 137, ASHOK NAGAR, BELAGAVI, KARNATAKA-590 016. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRANAV.S.KATAGERI., ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. PUSHKRAJ INFRA PROJECTS, R/BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SHRI. KULDEEP RATANLAL MANDOWARA, 35 MEGDOOT COLONY, SAMBHAJI NAGAR, SATARA-415 002, (MAHARASHTRA STATE). … RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Pranav S.Katageri., counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5336 WP No. 101983 of 2025 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petitioner may be permitted to withdrawal the Writ Petition and the petitioner may be permitted to file an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. 3. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same. 4. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. 5. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The permission is granted to the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22