RAM JETHANAND TANWANI S/O JETHANAND TANWANI v. UNION OF INDIA
CW/13402/2020 · 2025-11-10
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48176 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48176 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:45047] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13402/2020
1. Ram Jethanand Tanwani S/o Jethanand Tanwani, Aged About 50 Years, R/o 2Nd Floor, Bharat Palace Near Sunita Apt Ulhasnagar 421001 Mh. In (Din 03033552)
2. Chetan Haridas Mapara S/o Haridas Mapara, Aged About 52 Years, R/o D 3/4 2Nd Floor, Punit Cottage, Marve Road Adarsh Dugdhalaya Road, Malad West Mumbai 400064 Maharashtra (Din 06736522)
3. Hemendra Mapara Haridas S/o Haridas Mapara, Aged About 54 Years, R/o D3/4 2Nd Floor, Punit Cottage, Marve Road Adarsh Dugdhalaya Road, Malad West, Mumbai 400064 Maharashtra (Din-06736527)
4. Kalpesh Purshottam Shah S/o Purshottam Jevatllal Shah, Aged About 50 Years, R/o A-1202, Shubham Lavista Happy Home Chs Ltd. Near Datta Samant Office, Pantnagar, Ghatkopar East Mumbai - 400075 Maharashtra (Din - 01690192) ----Petitioners Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Corporate Affairs, A Wing, Shastri Bhawan, Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi, Delhi 110001
2. Registrar Of Companies, 100 Everest Marine Drive Mumbai 400002
3. Registrar Of Companies, G/6-7, Second Floor, Residency Area, Civil Lines, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 10/11/2025 Perusal of the file would reveal that on last occasion, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners. However, in the interest of justice, one more opportunity was granted to the petitioners to present their case but today also, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners even in second round.
[2025:RJ-JP:45047] (2 of 2) [CW-13402/2020] Perhaps, petitioners have lost interest in this civil writ petition. Accordingly, this civil writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /10