Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
• APHC010346982023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) B THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18439 OF 20?.? Between: Kota Vijayalakshmi, D/o. Varada Reddy, Aged Agriculture, R/o. D.No. 12/295, Hanumappa Street, Ammavarishala City, YSR Kadapa District about 49 years, Occ;. Kadapa ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Police District
3. The Superintendent of Police, Kapada City, YSR Kadapa District. 4. The Station House Officer, Muddanur Police District. Kurnool Range, Kurnool Station, YSR Kadapa ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd in not considering the petitioner's complaint, dated. 07-06-203 and respondent in not registering FIR against M. Madhusudan Reddy, Ex-Project praying that in the Respondent also 4th
Director of APMIP, YSR District as arbitrary, illegal and contra^ to law as laid ' down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court Pradesh (2014 2 SCC 1) and register the petitioner's complaint, dated. 07-06-2023. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed In support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th Respondent to register the petitioner's complaint, dated 07-06-2023. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PENJURI VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: in Lalitha Kumari Vs. State of Uttar consequently direct the 4th Respondent to
t APHC010346982023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18439/2023 Between:
1.KOTA VIJAYALAKSHMI, D/0. VARADA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/0. D.NO. 12/295, HANUMAPPA STREET, AMMAVARISHALA, KADAPA CITY, DISTRICT YSR KADAPA ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KURNOOL RANGE, KURNOOL DISTRICT 3.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , KAPADA CITY, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MUDDANUF POLICE STATION. YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT{S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not considering the petitioner's complaint , dated. 07-06- 203 and also 4th respondent in not registering FIR against M. Madhusudan Reddy, Ex-Project Director of APMIP, YSR District as arbitrary, illegal and
2 4' contrary to law as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Laiitha Kumari Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2014 2 SCC 1) and consequentiy direct the 4th Respondent to register the petitioner's complaint, dated. 07 -06-2023 and P3SS lA NO: 1 OF 202.? Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th Respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated. 07 -06-2023 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.PENJURI VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent(S);
1.GP FOR HOME
3 4' T^he Court made the following;
ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer;
“. ..to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not considering the petitioner's complaint , dated. 07-06-203 and also 4th respondent in not registering FIR against M. Madhusudan Reddy, Ex-Project Director of APMIP, YSR District as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to law as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalitha Kumari Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2014 2 SCC 1) and consequently direct the 4th Respondent register the petitioner's complaint, dated. 07 -06-2023 and to pass....
2. Heard Sri P.Venugopal,
learned counsel for the V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would petitioner and Sri
3. submit that on the representation dated 07.06.2023 submitted to the police, they have registered the crime, and the petition may be disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioner to file a private complaint before the concerned magistrate court.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
5. Considering the submissions made, this writ petition is
disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to recourse her remedies according to law before the appropriate forum.There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- M. SRINIVAS assistant registrar SECTJON OFFICER / //TRUE COPY// / To, T The Principal Secretary, Home Amaravati, Guntur Department, Secretariat Buildings,
2. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Kurnool Range, Kurnool District
3. The Superintendent of Police, Kapada City, YSR Kadapa District.
4. The Station House Officer, Muddanuf Police Station. District.
5. One CC to Sri Penjuri Venugopal Advocate [OPUC]
6. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
7. Two CD Copies YSR Kadapa TF
HIGH COURT DATED:17/07/2025
ORDER WP NO. 18439 OF 2023 yO C. o g,( 2 7 OCT 2025 disposing of the W.P., WITHOUT COSTS