Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48166 (PNJ)

GURMEET SINGH & ANR v. F.C. (APPEALS) PB. & ORS

CWP/10340/2010 · 2025-05-14

Harsh Bunger

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CM-6951-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-10340-2010 (O&M) -1- 107 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CM-6951-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-10340-2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.05.2025 Gurmeet Singh and another ..... Petitioners Versus Financial Commissioner (Appeals), Punjab and others ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER Present: Mr. N.S. Chahal, Advocate for Mr. Manu Rattan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nirmaljit Singh Diwana, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Mr. Jai Bhagwan, Advocate for the private respondents. ***** HARSH BUNGER J. (ORAL) CM-6951-CWP-2025 This is an application filed on behalf of the applicants/private respondents under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for disposing of the main writ petition (CWP-10340-2010) in view of the compromise deed dated 18.12.2024 (Annexure C-1). For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed as prayed for. On oral request, the main case (CWP-10340-2010), which was otherwise admitted vide order dated 19.03.2013, is taken up on Board today itself. HIMANI GUPTA 2025.06.03 14:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CM-6951-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-10340-2010 (O&M) -2- CWP-10340-2010 (O&M) This petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India inter alia seeking issuance of writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing order dated 23.09.2009 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Financial Commissioner (A.H.), Punjab in ROR No.867 of 2008 along with partition petition and consequent orders passed thereon. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties vide compromise deed dated 18.12.2024 (Annexure C-1), which has been signed by all the co-sharers. 3. The factum of compromise/settlement is not disputed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the non-applicants/petitioners. 3.1 Learned counsel for the non-applicants/petitioners submits that he has no objection if the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the compromise deed dated 18.12.2024 (Annexure C-1). 4. Keeping in view the statements made by learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the compromise deed dated 18.12.2024 (Annexure C-1). Parties to remain bound by the terms of compromise. 5. All the pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. 14.05.2025 (HARSH BUNGER) Himani JUDGE 1. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No 2. Whether reportable : Yes/No HIMANI GUPTA 2025.06.03 14:05 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh