MAHENDRA KUMAR BOHRA S/O TIKAM CHAND BOHRA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/19780/2025 · 2025-12-17
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48164 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48164 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:51339] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19780/2025 Mahendra Kumar Bohra S/o Tikam Chand Bohra, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Plot No. 115-A, Shri Kalyan Nagar, Kartarpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Education Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 17/12/2025
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- i) By an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby respondents be
directed to rectify the DPC year of petitioner for promotion on the post of Lecturer (History) against the year 2017-2018 instead of 2018- 2019 and thereafter assigned seniority on the post of Lecturer at appropriate place. ii) By an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the petitioner for promotion to the post of Vice Principal from the date persons junior to him were promoted and then assigned him appropriate seniority.
[2025:RJ-JP:51339] (2 of 2) [CW-19780/2025] iii) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondent may kindly be directed to consider the case of petitioner as law laid down by this Hon’ble High Court in the case of Pawan Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No.1665/2024) decided on 02.02.2024.
2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve his grievances.
3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /139