M/s. Sai Vishnu Constructions, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/24793/2025 · 2025-09-14
Harinath N
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48153 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48153 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010485832025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 24793/2025 Between: M/s. Sai Vishnu Constructions, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GNANESWARA RAO MITTIREDDI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP
2. S.V.S.S.SIVARAM SC For VMC
3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following:
2 W.P. No.24793 OF 2025 Date of order:15.09.2025
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.24793 OF 2025
ORDER
1. This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents for non-payment of the contingent bills for the works undertaken by the petitioner.
2. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning, and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent- Corporation.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has executed the works, viz., (i) Formation of Approach road for Housing Layout at Kondapalli from Ch 0.00 km to 1.50kmKondapalli Municipality (APSHCL), (ii) Formation of Approach road for Housing Layout at Kondapalli from Ch 1.50km to 3.00km Kondapalli Municipality (APSHCL Grant), vide agreement No.S.E/03/2023-24, dt.05.07.2023, as entrusted by the 3rd respondent.
4. The learned counsel further submits that the petitioner duly executed all the works to the satisfaction of the 3rd respondent and thereafter submitted a final bill aggregating to a sum of Rs.46,47,000/-. It is submitted that the progress of the work was recorded in the M book
3 W.P. No.24793 OF 2025 Date of order:15.09.2025
and the bills were approved. However, no payment has been forth coming.
5. During the course of the hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Corporation does not dispute the submissions made by the petitioner with respect to the completion of the work undertaken.
6. Considering the submissions, respondents 2, 3 and 6 are hereby
directed to verify and release the payments due payable to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
8. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N BV