Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4815 (RAJ)

SMT. PREM CHOUDHARY W/O. HARPHOOL SINGH JAT v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/1883/2025 · 2025-07-10

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:25501] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1883/2025 Smt. Prem Choudhary W/o. Harphool Singh Jat, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of 91-A, Central Colony, Phase-Iii, Road No. 8, Vkia, Sikar Road, Murlipura, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Local Self Bodies, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Department Of Local Self Bodies, G-3, Rajmahal Palace Residential Area, Civil Line Phatak, 22 Godam, Jaipur. 3. The Deputy Commissioner (Personnel), Nagar Nigam Greater, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Bhawan, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shiv Shanker Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surya Pratap Singh Rajawat for Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 10/07/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been filed by and on behalf of petitioner, seeking directions against the respondents to grant permission to the petitioner to undergo for a course of Sub Fire Officer from National Fire Brigade Service University, Nagpur. 2. From perusal of record, it appears that in respect of such course, respondents issued a letter dated 12.11.2024 to petitioner that she is required to submit no objection of other employees, who stand higher in seniority than the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:25501] (2 of 2) [CW-1883/2025] 3. In this writ petition, petitioner has neither impleaded other eligible employees, who are senior to petitioner in Nagar Nigam Greater, nor has enclosed any NOC. Further, relevant documents, showing purpose of undergoing such course by the employees and the basis of seeking NOC/ grant permission of employer, have not been enclosed. 4. In such view of the matter, counsel for petitioner, having instructions of petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars and after impleadment of affected parties. 5. Permission is granted. 6. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/158