Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48149 (CHH)

CHINTAMANI PAINKARA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/12872/2025 · 2025-11-13

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:55518 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12872 of 2025 1 - Chintamani Painkara S/o Sabad Singh Painkara Aged About 48 Years Posted As Sub Inspector (Tele-Communication) S.T.F. Baghera, Bhilai, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Umashankar Tekam S/o Kartik Ram Tekam Aged About 46 Years Posted As Sub Inspector (Telecommunication) Korba, Distt. Korba, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Vinay Kumar Bara S/o Selvester Bara Aged About 50 Years Posted As Sub Inspector (Telecommunication) Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Kamlesh Prasad Margiya S/o B. Margiya Aged About 51 Years Posted As Sub Inspector (Telecommn), Distt. Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home (Police), Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, P.S. And Post Rakhi, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director General Of Police (Dgp) Police Head Quarter (Phq), Sector 19, Police Station And Post Rakhi, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Additional Director General Of Police (Telecommunication) Police Head Quarter (Phq), Sector 19, P.S. And Post Rakhi, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Deputy Inspector General Of Police (Telecommunication) Police Head Quarter (Phq), Sector 19, P.S. And Post Rakhi, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Assistant Inspector General Of Police (Telecommunication) Police Head Quarter (Phq), Sector 19, P.S. And Post Rakhi, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. S.B. Pandey, Advocate. For State : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 14/11 /2025 1. The issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Om Prakash Dewangan & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & ors.[WPS No. 11544 of 2025 (decided on 10.10.2025)]. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Om Prakash Dewangan (supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2025.11.17 11:29:09 +0530