[2025:RJ-JP:47946] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13011/2025 Varsha Kumari D/o Tejaram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Keriya, Tehsil Chitalwana, Distt. Jalore, Presently Terminated Professor Subject History, Government Higher Secondary School Narawa, Block Keru, Distt. Jodhpur. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Prince Pal Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 26/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.16/2025 registered at Police Station SOG, Jaipur for the offence(s) under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC. and under Sections 3, 4, 6 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 1992. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is a female, aged about 28 years and survives with only mother, who is old and aging. It is submitted that no recovery is due qua the applicant. It is further submitted that the beneficiary, co-accused has been granted interim protection under Section 528 [2025:RJ-JP:47946] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13011/2025] of BNSS. It is submitted Act of 1982 as upon conviction, has a maximum sentence of three years. It is lastly submitted that the applicant is behind the bars ever since 09.10.2024. 3. Reliance is placed upon judgment of Ankita Godara Vs. State of Rajasthan passed by Apex Court in SLA (Crl.) No. 5406/2025 decided vide order dated 13.05.2025. 4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. It is submitted that the FSL report has given an affirmative stance qua the prosecution story against the applicant. It is next submitted that there are strong antecedents of similar nature against the petitioner. 5. Heard and considered. 6. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that applicant is a female, aged about 28 years and survives with only mother, who is old and aging; that the trial will take a long time to conclude and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge her on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Varsha Kumari D/o Tejaram shall be enlarged on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for her appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:47946] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13011/2025] 8. However, non-applicant-State is at liberty to make appropriate bail cancellation application, if any act of the applicant is found adverse to the conditions so imposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /49