Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48139 (RAJ)

SANTOSH RAWAT D/O NARAYAN SINGH W/O ASLAM B/C RAWAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/7293/2019 · 2025-11-03

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44145] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.7293/2019 1. Santosh Rawat D/o Narayan Singh W/o Aslam, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Khimpura Tehsil Masuda, Police Station Masuda Disst. Ajmer, Rajasthan. 2. Aslam Khan S/o Haider Kathat, Aged About 22 Years, Khimpura Tehsil Masuda, Police Station Masuda Distt. Ajmer Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor. 2. Superintendent of Police, Ajmer. 3. Station House Officer, Police Station Masuda, Distt. Ajmer. 4. Narayan Singh S/o Ghisa Singh, R/o Khimpura Tehsil Masuda, Police Station Masuda Distt. Ajmer Rajasthan. 5. Sharwan Singh S/o Ghisa Singh, R/o Khimpura Tehsil Masuda, Police Station Masuda Distt. Ajmer Rajasthan. 6. Sohan Singh S/o Ghisa Singh, R/o Khimpura Tehsil Masuda, Police Station Masuda Distt. Ajmer Rajasthan. 7. Mahander Singh S/o Narayan Singh, R/o Khimpura Tehsil Masuda, Police Station Masuda Distt. Ajmer Rajasthan. 8. Ravender Singh S/o Bhanwe Lal, R/o Khimpura Tehsil Masuda, Police Station Masuda Distt. Ajmer Rajasthan. 9. Dhara Singh S/o Anna Singh, R/o Khimpura Tehsil Masuda, Police Station Masuda Distt. Ajmer Rajasthan. 10. Nemi S/o Heera Lal, R/o Khimpura Tehsil Masuda, Police Station Masuda Distt. Ajmer Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 03/11/2025 1. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioners for seeking a direction against the respondents No.1 to 3 to provide adequate safety and security to the [2025:RJ-JP:44145] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7293/2019] petitioners and to ensure that no coercive action is taken against them by their relatives non-petitioners No.4 to 10. 2. It is contended in the petition that both the petitioners are major and have performed marriage, however, their relatives were not happy with their marriage and have given them life threat. 3. Vide interim order dated 22.11.2019, this Court directed the respondent No.3, S.H.O. Police Station-Masuda, District-Ajmer to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners from their relatives. Thereafter, nothing has been placed on record on behalf of the petitioners to show that threat perception is still existing. 4. In view of the above, more particularly when nobody is there to pursue the present Criminal Miscellaneous Petition and looking to the fact that this petition was filed six years back, the present Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is, hereby, dismissed for want of prosecution. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/41