IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 203 Jaipal Singh Jatinderpal Singh and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. Sections 12 and 14 215 of the Constitution of India, for non 24.03.2025 CWP-37555 Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens, Karnal and others’. 2. petitioner that in comp P-1) payment of respondents to the petitioner nothing survives in the present petition and the same may be 3. accordingly 4. 5. 29.08.2025 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: Jaipal Singh Versus Jatinderpal Singh and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Nihal S. Choudhary, Advocate for Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has filed the present contempt petition 12 and 14 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, for non 24.03.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 37555-2018 titled as ‘Jatinderpal Singh Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens, Karnal and At the very outset, it is admitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance of the order dated 1) payment of ₹1,60,000/- due to the petitioner has been made by the respondents to the petitioner. Therefore, learned counsel submits that nothing survives in the present petition and the same may be In view of the above, the present petition is accordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .08.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1994-2025 Date of Decision: 29.08.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Nihal S. Choudhary, Advocate for Parveen Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the respondents. The petitioner has filed the present contempt petition under of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, for non-compliance of order dated -ordinate Bench of this Court in Jatinderpal Singh vs. The Tribunal under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens, Karnal and it is admitted by learned counsel for the liance of the order dated 24.03.2025 (Annexure due to the petitioner has been made by the herefore, learned counsel submits that nothing survives in the present petition and the same may be disposed of. the present petition is disposed of, Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No under of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article compliance of order dated Bench of this Court in The Tribunal under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens, Karnal and it is admitted by learned counsel for the 24.03.2025 (Annexure due to the petitioner has been made by the herefore, learned counsel submits that , RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.29 16:57 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.