SHRI DYAMANNA SINGADEPPA MALLAPUR v. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (AUDIT-1)
WP/100072/2024 · 2025-03-24
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48125 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48125 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5339 WP No. 100072 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 100072 OF 2024 (T-RES) BETWEEN:
SHRI. DYAMANNA SINGADEPPA MALLAPUR, WORKS CONTRACTOR, CTS NO.3097/23, LAXMI NAGAR, BADAMI-587 201, DIST: BAGALKOT. GSTIN:29ABBPM5082G1ZK.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAKESH BILKI., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VIDYASHANKAR.G.DALAWAI., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER (AUDIT-1), VANIJYA TERIGE BHAVAN, SECTOR NO.7, NAVANGAR, BAGALKOT-587 101.
2.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU-560 001.
3.
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, (REVENUE), MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001.
4.
THE GST COUNCIL, THROUGH ITS CHAIRPERSON,
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5339 WP No. 100072 of 2024
MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA.R.PATIL., HCGP FOR R1, 2;
SRI. AVINASH.M.ANGADI., ADVOCATE FOR R3;
SRI. GIRISH.S.HULMANI., ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Rakesh Bilki., counsel on behalf of Sri.Vidyashankar G.Dalwai., for the petitioner has appeared in person.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.
3. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by advocate on record and the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:5339 WP No. 100072 of 2024
4. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record.
5. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 18