Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48124 (AP)

GUNUPUDI BABU v. DR K PADMAVATHI

CC/2712/2025 · 2025-09-25

Challa Gunaranjan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010508852025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2712/2025 Between: 1. GUNUPUDI BABU, S/O.MACHARAYYA, AGE47 YEARS, OCCMPHA(MALE)(UNDER TERMINATION), R/O.6-89, S.C.COLONY, PEDDEVAM, TALLAPUDI MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT -534340 ...PETITIONER AND 1. DR K PADMAVATHI, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, D.NO.189, 2NDFLOOR, HIMAGNA TOWERS, NTR MARG, LIC COLONY, B-BLOCK, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. 2. SMT K VETRI SEIVI, IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU, ERSTWHILE WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT-534201 3. 3. DR P J AMRUTHAM, M.D., DISTRICT MEDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICER, ELURU, ERSTWHILE WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT-534201 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents for their willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders dt.8.5.2025 in W.P.No. 12857 of 2025 passed by this Honbl Court, under the provisions of the Contemptof Courts Act, 1971 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVAS BOBBILI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2712/2025 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, seeks liberty to challenge the speaking order dated 04.07.2025, which came to be passed in consequence to the interim orders dated 08.05.2025 passed in W.P.No.12856 of 2025. Inasmuch as, by the aforesaid impugned orders, this Court has permitted petitioners to make a representation to reconsider the interim orders under challenge in the writ petition, and on such representation being made, the 4th respondent was directed to consider and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, now as by speaking orders, the request of petitioners came to be rejected, this Court is of the opinion that there would not be any contempt against such order. Therefore, petitioner is permitted to take appropriate steps against rejection order dated 04.07.2025. 2. This Court is of the opinion that there would not be any contempt in respect of the rejection order dated 04.07.2025. 3. The present contempt case accordingly stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN 3 Date: 26.09.2025 NKA 606 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2712/2025 Date: 26.09.2025 NKA