Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48123 (DEL)

MEGHNA BHUYAN v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.

W.P.(C)/3876/2025 · 2025-11-17

Mini Pushkarna

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~7 (Appellate Side) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3876/2025, CM APPL. 1685/2026 & CM APPL. 1686/2026 MEGHNA BHUYAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rudra Pratap Singh, Mr. Tushar Randhawa, Mr. Rahul Sharma, Mr. Ali Ibrahim, Advs. Mob: 8800000881 Mr. M.A. Chaudhary, Adv.(Through VC) versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tarunvir Singh Khehar and Mr. Guneet Bindra, Advs. for MCD (Through VC) Mob: 9910122225 Email: contactuskla@gmail.com Mr. Nimish Chib, Adv. for R-4 to 8. (Through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA O R D E R % 12.01.2026 CM APPL. 1685/2026 1. The present is an application on behalf of the petitioner seeking recall of the order dated 17th November, 2025, on the ground that the petitioner’s counsel was not present and was not heard. 2. However, this Court notes that the order dated 17th November, 2025 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/01/2026 at 13:29:56 records the presence of Mr. M.A. Chaudhary, Mr. Shehzad Khan, Mr. Vivek Dixit, Mr. Salimuddin and Mr. Kanish Singh, Advocates appearing for the petitioner. 3. Mr. M.A. Chaudhary, Advocate puts in appearance today and submits that his Vakalatnama is on record and he duly represented the petitioner on 17th November, 2025. 4. However, the aforesaid fact is disputed by Mr. Rudra Pratap Singh, Advocate who submits that he was engaged by the petitioner, as recorded in the order dated 27th October, 2025. 5. Per contra, Mr. Tarunvir Singh Khehar, learned counsel appearing for the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”) submits that as per the record of this Court, the vakalatnama on behalf of Mr. Rudra Pratap Singh, Advocate for the petitioner was filed only on 24th December, 2025. 6. Accordingly, issue notice. Notice is accepted by the learned counsel appearing for the non-applicants. 7. Let reply be filed by the non-applicants, within a period of two weeks. 8. Rejoinder thereto, if any, be filed within a period of one week, thereafter. 9. In view of the nature of the dispute, the petitioner is directed to appear before this Court in person, on the next date of hearing. 10. Re-notify on 12th February, 2026. MINI PUSHKARNA, J JANUARY 12, 2026/SK This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/01/2026 at 13:29:56