[2025:RJ-JP:47783] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18470/2023 Aditya Vyas S/o Vinod Kumer Vyas, Aged About 25 Years, R/o C/o Dr. Alok Upadhyaya, Santosh Sagar Colony, Street No. 4, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary To The Government, Department Of Personnel, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Director, Primary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 4. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Chairman, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Saumil Sharma for Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC Mr. Narendra Singh Choudhary Mr. Nikhil Pal Singh Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred with following prayers:- i. By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents be directed to give appointment to the petitioner on the post of Teacher Level 2 (Sanskrit) Special Education with all consequential benefits [2025:RJ-JP:47783] (2 of 3) [CW-18470/2023] as the petitioner secured more marks than the last cut off in his category. ii. By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the qualification of petitioner as requisite qualification for the post of Special Teacher Gr. III Level 2 Sanskrit. iii. By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the impugned result dated 21.09.2023 may kindly be quashed and set aside. iv. Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner while placing reliance upon order dated 27.10.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18247/2023, submits that controversy raised herein is already settled by judgment of Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of Deepika Kunwar Chundawat vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.31/2024) and other connected matters and instant petition be decided in accordance with ratio as laid down in case of Deepika Kunwar Chundawat (supra). 3. Mr. Saumit Sharma on behalf of Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC put in appearance for respondents No.1 and 3, whereas Mr. Prakhar Jain on behalf of Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC for respondent No.2 and Mr. Narendra Singh Choudhary for respondent No.4 and 5. 4. Office is directed to reflect names of Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC, Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC and Mr. Narendra Singh Choudhary as counsel for respondents. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that if the ratio is applicable then they will consider application of ratio upon the case of present petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:47783] (3 of 3) [CW-18470/2023] 6. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for parties and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of on same terms, if applicable on facts of the case, in light of judgment in case of Deepika Kunwar Chundawat (supra) decided by the Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. 7. The writ petition and pending application(s), if any stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J Chandan/283