KAREVVA W/O LAKKAPPA PASANDAVAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/82212/2013 · 2025-02-06
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48116 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48116 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:2382-DB WP No. 82212 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 82212 OF 2013 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT. KAREVVA W/O. LAKKAPPA PASANDAVAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. ANAGAWADI, TALUK BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANTOSH B. MANE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPT. OF REVENUE BY ITS SECRETARY, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BAGALKOT.
3.
THE GENERAL MANAGER, REHABILITATION AND RECONSTRUCTION UPPER KRISHNA PROJECT, NAGANAVAR, BAGALKOT.
4.
THE REHABILITATION OFFICER REHABILITATION CENTRE, UPPER KRISHNA PROJECT, BILGAI.
5.
SANGAYYA GURAYYA KAMBI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
6.
ERAYYA GURAYYA KAMBI, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:2382-DB WP No. 82212 of 2013
7.
GURAYYA BASAYYA KAMBI AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
(RESPONDENTS 5 TO 7 ARE RESIDENTS OF REHABILITATION CENTER, ANAGAWADI, TALUK BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT.) …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR R1 & R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DTD.11.03.2010 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.4 VIDE ANNEXURE-C HOLDING THE SAME AS ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL. DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4 CONSIDER THE REQUEST OF THE PETITIONER AND CONFIRM THE ALLOTMENT MADE IN HER FAVOUR AS PER ANNEXURE-B DTD.20.09.2008 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.4.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking to withdraw the petition.
2. In terms of the memo so filed, petition is
disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE RHR/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0