1 2025:CGHC:60195-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3743 of 2025 1. Arif Khan S/o Rafik Khan Aged About 35 Years R/o Ward No. 11 Bhuthikola Budhar, District - Shahdol (M.P.) 2. Sakila Begam W/o Rafik Khan Aged About 63 Years (Wrongly Mentioned In Chargesheet As Sakila Begam W/o Rafik Ahmad) R/o Ward No. 11 Bhuthikola Budhar, District - Shahdol (M.P.) 3. Shama Parvin W/o Akram Ansari Aged About 32 Years R/o Ward No. 11 Bhuthikola Budhar, District - Shahdol (M.P.) 4. Shahina Danish W/o Danish Mirza Aged About 31 Years R/o Aasma City Phase-04, Quarter No. Ao/1, P.S. Sakri, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station - Mahila Thana, Distt - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2. Smt. Shagufi Khan W/o Arif Khan Aged About 30 Years R/o Ganesh Nagar, Chuchuhiyapara, Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.12.11 18:51:22 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Akash Singh, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Soumya Rai, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 11.12.2025 1. Heard Mr. Akash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Soumya Rai, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondent No. 1. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant petition and further be pleased to set-aside/quashed the final report No. 52 of 2025 in Crime No. 42 of 2025 registered in Police Station – Mahila Thana Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, and cognizance order dated 10.07.2025 in Criminal Case No. 21759 of 2025 and all proceedings of said criminal case pending before JMFC Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.), in the interest of justice.” 3. Upon perusal of the prayer clause in the present petition, it appears that the petition has been drafted with a defective prayer. We 3 are, therefore, not inclined to entertain the petition in its present form, as the prayer is vague and sketchy and does not disclose the offences for which the impugned FIR has been registered or the charge-sheet filed before the competent Court. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition containing an appropriate and complete prayer. 4. Learned State Counsel has no objection to the same. 5. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, subject to the petitioner depositing a sum of Rs.1,000/- as costs before the Registry of this Court. The receipt of such deposit shall be submitted at the time of filing the fresh petition, if any. The amount so deposited shall be transmitted to the Government Disabled College, Mana Camp, Raipur (C.G.). 6. Certified copies of the documents annexed to the petition, if any, may be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photocopies on record. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan