Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48101 (RAJ)

NAWAB KHAN @ NABAB KHAN S/O AMEER KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12277/2025 · 2025-10-06

Chandra Prakash Shrimali

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40518] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12277/2025 Nawab Khan @ Nabab Khan S/o Ameer Khan, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Samokar, At Present R/o As A Tenant Mangti Khan Ka Makan, Behind Of Sabji Mandi, Ganeshi Market Bayana, Police Station Bayana District Bharatpur At Present R/o As A Tenant Shri Vaibhav Gaud Ka Makan No. 03 Indrapuri Colony, Lalkothi, Police Station Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur South. (Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP Mr. Deendayal, Adv. Ms. Rekha Chaudhary (Party in person) for complainant HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 06/10/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.230/2025 registered at Police Station Jyoti Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence(s) under Section(s) 64(1), 115(2), 126(2) & 351(3) of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the compromise has been arrived at between the parties. He further submits that the accused-petitioner has been in judicial custody [2025:RJ-JP:40518] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12277/2025] since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant and Ms. Rekha Chaudhary, complainant (party in person) admits the factum of compromise arrived at between the parties and he has further submits that he has no objection that the present accused- petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, perused the material available on record the accused- petitioner has been in judicial custody since long but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner Nawab Khan @ Nabab Khan S/o Ameer Khan is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J GAURAV SHARMA /189