Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010586072022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 35430/2022 Between:
1. NUNNA HARANADH, S/O (LATE) VEERAVGADRA RAO OCC- TOBACCO BUSINESS 33-2-1/1, OPP- SAI BABA TEMPLE KAKINADA. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME) SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDNAT OF POLICE, KAKINADA
3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, KAKINADA. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, III TOWN L AND 0 P.S., KAKINADA
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a Writ , Order or Direction more particularly in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Police particularly the 4th Respondent opended a Suspect / History Sheet against the petitoner Nunna Harinath vide Suspect/ History Sheet No. 218/2019 dt 02-11-2019 Continuing to operate/maintain the said History Sheet as against the Petitioner even though there is no required Criminal Cases as against the petitoner , on that trying to Call to the police station all are Illegal, Unlawful, Without have any jurisdiction , Violation of Article 14,19,21 of the Constitution of India there by to direct the Respondent Police not to Call for nor interefere into the petitoner personal liberty unnecessary in the interest of the justice. and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. R SIVA SAI SWARUP Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: < ...
to Issue a Writ , Order or Direction more particularly in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Police particularly the 4th Respondent opened a Suspect / History Sheet against the Petitioner vide Suspect/ History Sheet No.218/2019 dt.02-11-2019 Continuing to operate/maintain the said History Sheet as against him even though there is no Criminal Cases pending against him, on that trying to Call to the police station all are Illegal, Unlawful, Without have any jurisdiction , Violation of Articles 14,19,21 of the Constitution of India, thereby, to direct the Respondent Police not to Call and not to interfere in the petitioner >spersonal liberty unnecessary in the interest of the justice. and to pass ...=
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record written instructions and would submit that as per the instructions of the Sub Divisional Police Officer, Kakinada, dated 31.12.2024, the rowdy sheet against the Petitioner is closed and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 10.12.2025
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 35430 of 2022
10.12.2025
Mjl /*