Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48095 (AP)

Pamarthi Veerababu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/11172/2019 · 2025-12-22

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010248412019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 11172/2019 Between: 1. PAMARTHI VEERABABU, S/O.APPARAO, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O.PATHARAMAVARAM VILLAGE, GANGAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL.SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GANGAVARAM POLICE STATION, GANGAVARAM (AGENCY) MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with my peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land of an extent of Ac.1.34 cents in Sy.No.1913B situated in Patharamavaram Village, Gangavaram (Agency) Mandal in East Godavari District without power or authority is wholly illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Art.14, 21 and 300A of the constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not interfere with petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the above mentioned land IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not interfere with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land of an extent of Ac.1.34 cents in Sy.No.19/3B situated in Patharamavaram Village, Gangavaram (Agency) Mandal in East Godavari District and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K VENKATESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.11172 of 2019 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the 3rd respondent not to interfere with the petitioner’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land admeasuring Ac. 1.34 cents in Sy. No. 191/3B, situated at Patharamavaram Village, Gangavaram Agency Mandal, East Godavari District. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submitted that the revenue officials had earlier reported that proceedings under Section 144 of the Cr.P.C. were promulgated in respect of the subject land, as both parties were quarrelling over the same. It was further submitted that the police and revenue officials are not interfering in the matter, as it is a civil dispute. The submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader are placed on record. 4. Upon considering the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that the dispute is civil in nature and that the police will not interfere in such civil disputes, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed at the stage of admission, without going into the merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 23rd December, 2025 cbn 91 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 11172 of 2019 23rd December, 2025 cbn