Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2025 DAILYLAW 48094 (RAJ)
VISHAL S/O OMPRAKASH, MINOR THROUGH HIS NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER OMPRAKASH S/O LAXMANSINGH v. SAMUNDAR SINGH S/O SHYAM SINGH
CMA/1273/2021 · 2025-12-02
Ashutosh Kumar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48094 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48094 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:49622] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1273/2021 Vishal S/o Omprakash, Minor Through His Natural Guardian Father Omprakash S/o Laxmansingh, Aged About 16 Years, R/o Nagla Barawali, Police Station And Tehsil Deeg, District Bharatpur. ----Appellant/Claimant Versus
1. Samundar Singh S/o Shyam Singh, R/o Village Barawali, Police Stationl Deeg, District Bharatpur.(Driver/ Registered Owner of Tractor No. RJ-05-RB-7640)
2. United India Insurance Company Limited Through Divisional Manager, Divisional Office Ashok Circle, Alwar (Insurance Company of Tractor No. RJ-05-RB-7640) ----Non-Claimants/Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Santosh Kumar Soni, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rizwan Ahmed, Adv. with Mr. Mohsin, Adv. HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 02/12/2025 1- vihykFkhZ }kjk ;g vihy /kkjk&173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e&1988 ds rgr U;k;ky; eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] Hkjriqj ¼ftls vkxs ^fo}ku vf/kdj.k* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k&47@2018 ¼04@2018½] fo'kky cuke leqUnjflag o vU; esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 07-04-2021 ¼ftls vkxs *vk{ksfir fu.kZ;* ds uke ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ ds fo#) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- vihykFkhZ fo'kky ds ukckfyx gksus ds dkj.k tfj;s laj{kd mlds firk vkseizdk'k dh vksj ls fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds le{k mlds iq= fo'kky ds eksVj nq?kZVuk esa vkgr gks tkus ds QyLo:i dqy 1]13]02]000@& #i;s Dyse izkIr djus gsrq Dyse ;kfpdk izLrqr dh x;h FkhA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk mDr Dyse ;kfpdk esa ;kph dks dqy 60]000@& #i;s dh [2025:RJ-JP:49622] (2 of 4) [CMA-1273/2021] {kfriwfrZ jkf’k e; C;kt 06 izfr’kr lkykuk dh nj ls fnyokbZ x;h gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k ds mDr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj gLrxr vihy] tfj;s laj{kd vihykFkhZ ds firk dh vksj ls {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus gsrq izLrqr dh x;h gSA 3- nkSjkus cgl fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ dk rdZ jgk fd gLrxr nq?kZVuk ds QyLo:i vihykFkhZ ds iwjs 'kjhj esa 20 izfr'kr LFkkbZ fu;ksZX;rk vkuk ik;k x;k gSA fdUrq fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dks vk; dh dksbZ {kfr gksuk ugha ekurs gq, 'kkjhfjd o ekufld ihM+k] ifjpkjd O;;] fo'ks"k [kqjkd] ifjogu vkfn enksa esa ,deq'r 60]000@& #i;s dh jkf'k fnyokbZ tkdj =qfV dkfjr dh xbZ gSA tcfd vihykFkhZ nq?kZVuk ds i'pkr~ dkQh yEcs ls vLirky esa HkrhZ jgkA ftl dkj.k vihykFkhZ ds bykt ij] ;krk;kr ij rFkk fo'ks"k vkgkj vkfn ij vR;f/kd jkf'k [kpZ gqbZA fdUrq fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk mijksDr rF;ksa ij xkSj ugha fd;k x;k rFkk cgqr de jkf’k gh vihykFkhZ dks fnyokbZ x;h gS] ftlesa c<+ksrjh dh tkosA vr% vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy Lohdkj dh tkdj {kfriwfrZ jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh x;hA 4- blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ chek dEiuh dh vksj ls vihykFkhZ ds mijksDr rdksZa dk fojks/k djrs gq, fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; dh iqf"V fd;s tkus rFkk vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls lafLFkr dh x;h vihy dks fujLr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA 5- nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh x;hA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA 6- gLrxr ekeys esa vihykFkhZ dks 13 o"kZ dh vk;q dk ckyd gksuk crk;k x;k gS rFkk Dyse ;kfpdk tfj;s izkd`frd laj{kd firk }kjk izLrqr dh x;h gSA eksVjokgu nq?kZVuk esa pksVxzflr ckydksa dks ftuds
'kjhj ij LFkkbZ fu;ksZX;rk dkfjr gksuk ik;k tkrk gS] bl laca/k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us vius U;kf;d n`"Vkar ekLVj efYydktqZu cuke fMfotuy eSustj] us'kuy b'a;ksjsal dEiuh fyfeVsM o vU; fjiksVsZM bu ,vkbZvkj 2014 ,llh 736 esa fuEufyf[kr fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS %& "12. Though it is difficult to have an accurate assessment of the compensation in the case of
[2025:RJ-JP:49622] (3 of 4) [CMA-1273/2021] children suffering disability on account of a motorvehicle accident, having regard to the relevant factors, precedents and the approach of various High Courts, we are of the view that the appropriate compensation on all other heads in addition to the actual expenditure for treatment, attendant, etc., should be, if the disability is above 10% and upto 30% to the whole body, Rs.3 lakhs; upto 60%, Rs.4 lakhs; upto 90%, Rs.5 lakhs and above 90%, it should be Rs.6 lakhs.
For permanent disability upto 10%, it should be Re.1 lakh, unless there are exceptional circumstances to take different yardstick." 7- gLrxr ekeys esa vihykFkhZ oDr ?kVuk 13 o"khZ; ckyd FkkA ftlds 'kjhj ij dkfjr pksVksa ds QyLo#i LFkkbZ fu;ksZX;rk izek.k i= izn'kZ&16 ds vk/kkj ij 20 izfr'kr LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk gksuk ik;k gSA vr% ekLVj efYydktqZu ¼mijksDr½ ds ekeys ds ekeys esa izfrikfnr fl}kUr ds vk/kkj ij vihykFkhZ dks 20 izfr'kr LFkk;h fu;ksZX;rk dkfjr gksus ds dkj.k 3]00]000@& #i;s dh jkf'k fnyok;k tkuk mfpr izdV gksrk gSA 8- fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk vihykFkhZ dks bykt ds nkSjku vLirky esa HkrhZ jgus dh en esa i`Fkd ls dksbZ jkf’k ugha fnyokbZ x;h gSA vihykFkhZ bykt gsrq fnukad 05-09-2017 ls 10-09-2017 rd dqy 06 fnol rd vLirky esa HkrhZ jgk gSA vr% bl en esa ge] vihykFkhZ dks 600@& #i;s izfrfnu ds fglkc ls dqy 3]600@& #i;s dh jkf'k fnyok;k tkuk mfpr le>rs gSaA 9- mijksDr foospu vuqlkj vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr dh x;h vihy dks vkaf’kd :i ls Lohdkj fd;k tkdj fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr iapkV ftlds }kjk vihykFkhZ@DysesaV dks 60]000@& :i;s fnyok;s tkus dk vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] ds LFkku ij 3]03]600@& :i;s dk iapkV ikfjr fd;k tkrk gSA vihykFkhZ }kjk iwoZ esa izkIr dh x;h jkf’k dks iapkV jkf’k esa ls lek;ksftr fd;k tkdj 'ks"k jkf’k vihykFkhZ izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ik;k tkrk gSA
[2025:RJ-JP:49622] (4 of 4) [CMA-1273/2021] 10- bl vkns'k }kjk c<kbZ xbZ {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ij ;kfpdk nk;j djus dh frfFk ls vihykFkhZ@DysesaV] 08 izfr'kr okf"kZd C;kt izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gSA 11- rnuqlkj ;g vihy fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J LOKESH RAJ /29