Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48092 (AP)

BURRI MADHURI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/4816/2025 · 2025-05-01

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010224602025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4816/2025 Between: Burri Madhuri and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. AYESHA AZMA S Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are arrayed as accused Nos.4 and 5 in Crime No.19 of 2025 on the file of Mahila UPS, Machilipatnam Town Police Station, Krishna district, for alleged offences under Section 85 of BNS and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted that the petitioners are residing at Bangalore 2 and never interfered with the marital disputes of the 1st accused and the 2nd respondent. 3. Be that as it may, as the notices under Section 35(3) of BNSS are issued to the petitioners, it is left open for the petitioners to submit a reply/response along with the necessary documents for the police or to the Investigating Officer for conducting the investigation. 4. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of, leaving it open for the petitioners to file a fresh petition, if so aggrieved with the charge sheet. 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date : 02.05.2025 BMS