SEELAM NARASIMHA REDDY v. THE STATE OF AP., REP BY PP & ANOTHER
CRLRC/1080/2012 · 2025-12-01
Subhendu Samanta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48091 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48091 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010543922012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1080/2012 Between:
1. SEELAM NARASIMHA REDDY, S/O RAMI REDDY HINDU, R/O VIDYA NAGAR, GUNTUR
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP REP BY PP ANOTHER, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF AP., HYDERABAD
2. PATIBANDLA HEMALATHA, W/O M.RAGHAVA RAO HINDU, R/O D.NO.10-2-15, CHENCHUPET, TENALI,GUNTUR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased to present this Crl.RC before this Honble Court against the Judgment passed in Crl.A.No.387/2011 on the file of the Court of the II Addl.Sessions Judge, Guntur District dt 13.4.2012 to the extent aggrieved in modifying the Judgment passed in CC No.225/2008 on the file of the Court of the Spl.JFCM., for Prohibition and Excise Guntur dt 1-10.2011 IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CRLRCMP 1600 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 1 days in representing of SR No.1833 of 2012 and pass
2 SS,J Crl.R.C.No.1080 of 2012
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M RAVINDRA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. DEVI PRASAD MANGALAPURI
2. -
3. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following:
3 SS,J Crl.R.C.No.1080 of 2012
ORDER: Ms. S. Maha Swetha Varma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri M. Ravindra, learned advocate for the petitioner submits on instructions that the petitioner not intending to proceed further in the instant Criminal Revision Case. Taking note of the submissions of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the instant Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as not pressed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this petition, shall stand closed.
____________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Date: 02.12.2025 JLSR/PBS