Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4809 (UTT)

VIRENDRA KUMAR v. UMESH KUMAR

ELEP/2/2022 · 2025-03-20

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS ELEP No.2 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Pooran Singh Rawat, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Gopal K. Verma and Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocates for the respondent. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner made a statement at bar that he has no instructions, in the present matter; therefore, this Court has no option but to dismiss the present election petition for non-prosecution. 4. The present election petition is pending, from June, 2023, for examination of P.W.3-Sundar Singh. 5. Accordingly, election petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 20.03.2025 SK